The Zoning Administrator changed the tower’s design from a 55-foot palm tree or “monopalm” to a 52-foot bell tower to replace an existing tower to ensure it wouldn’t be detrimental to the value of the property and the neighborhood, according to city documents.
Despite the change, residents are still concerned over the health risks.
“The bottom line is, the people know there is a cell tower there no matter how you disguise it,” Anderson said.
Residents have been picketing the church on Sundays and circulating a petition against the tower. The petition has about 350 signatures.
The tower is being built to meet customer demands, said T-Mobile spokesman Rod De La Rosa.
“In making our decision on where to locate a new site, T-Mobile undertakes a rigorous engineering analysis of available coverage and future expansion needs,” he said.
The city also determined the tower “will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons working or residing in the vicinity,” according to a report.
Church representatives attended the public hearing to support T-Mobile, they said in a statement.
“Following this decision, the church expects to move forward with its lease,” the statement reads.
The residents’ appeal will go to the Planning Commission and, if appealed again, to the City Council, according to city documents. The City Council’s decision is final.