"We are for development. We're not against development," said Neighbors President David Rice. "We're just for doing it responsibly, and the plan in place is irresponsible. We just want to make sure everything is being looked at."
The EIR the city prepared is what's called a program document, which gives the city the benefit of addressing broad policies, guidelines and measures needed to accommodate a future project, according to the response. Once the city begins to implement the proposed development, another detailed EIR would be required, the response stated.
The Neighbors, though, argued that the EIR fails to provide traffic, noise and parking studies on summer nights and weekends when the downtown area sees the most visitors and patrons. The group also argued that the report doesn't project enough police presence because it bases the need for enforcement on future residential and not commercial developments.
"They fudged something that's not representative of reality," Rice said.
The city argued that there is no evidence that the traffic study, which is almost 1,000 pages long, was not sufficient.
The only issue the court must examine is whether the study is credible, the response noted.
The EIR provides answers to future parking needs, which could include a shuttle service, the use of a commercial parking lot and valet, and parking permits for residents, according to the response.
Kim Kramer, spokesman for the Huntington Beach Downtown Residents Assn., said his group refused to join the lawsuit and advised against it because it jumps the gun.
"When you sue the city, you really want to have a good chance of winning, and you got to remember, this is going to cost the taxpayers money," Kramer said.